| Wheel
Clamping |
ACTION
JUSTIFIED
Police were slammed for setting up a
speed trap on double yellow lines at a lay-by bus
stop. The RAC said the police van with a camera
in the back put other vehicles in danger and was
just yards from a permanent trap. A spokesman
said, "It doesn't make road safety sense.
Lay-by stops were designed to allow buses to pull
out of danger." Police said the mobile
camera was necessary. |
EVERYONE
KNOWS
Northumbria Police Acting Chief
Inspector of motor patrols, Paul Gilroy said,
"Speed cameras don't reduce casualties, they
are just for revenue generation." Like, we
didn't already know that. |
TWO
SETS OF RULES
It was a case of one rule for the
Government and another for the rest of us when a
van was allowed to park on a pavement while it
tried to catch tax dodgers. The Driver and
Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) van, which was
fitted with scanning equipment to check tax discs
on passing cars, blocked Paul Johnson's way as he
tried to walk along Osmaston Road in Derby.
Although it is not an offence in itself to park
on the pavement, police have the power to issue
tickets or advice if a vehicle causes an
obstruction. Mr Johnson was told the DVLA would
not be punished. He said, "I spoke to a
young man who was operating the equipment. When I
told him his van was obstructing the pavement, he
said he had police permission to park there.
There was little room to get pushchairs or
wheelchairs past, forcing pedestrians on to the
busy road." |
|
|
ILLEGAL PARKING?
A police mobile
camera van was spotted apparently illegally parked in a
busy Derby street during rush hour. The villain of the
peace was a trainee police officer, who the force claims
was not snooping for speeders but "getting to know
the area". He had parked the van half on the
pavement and half on the road in Station Road,
Mickleover. The force's embarrassment was deepened by the
fact the van was parked within two yards of a road sign
reminding motorists that 13 people have been injured
along Station Road in the last three years. A bottleneck
was caused on the busy road by the van and traffic was
forced to queue as motorists from either direction took
turns to pass it, until it moved about an hour later.
Sergeant Pete Szabo, a spokesman for Derbyshire police,
said, "It's not an offence to park on the pavement
per se but, if it causes an obstruction, there is the
power to issue a ticket or to offer the motorist
advice." Although the police have not issued their
own van with a ticket, Superintendent Tony Bateman, the
head of Derbyshire police's operations division, said the
matter had been investigated.
He said, "I appreciate that this incident has caused
concerns and even anger amongst local Mickleover
residents. The officer concerned is a new trainee. He was
not issuing tickets on the day in question and no
motorists will receive any processes in relation to that
incident. He was just in the area familiarising himself
with the road and its problems. Obviously it's been made
clear to him that he shouldn't have parked where he was
and the problems that it obviously caused. Police
officers are not above the law. All officers using police
vehicles are aware they should not park on pavements,
verges, bus stops, or any other area where they would be
likely to cause problems or an obstruction. In light of
this incident, I will ensure that this policy is being
correctly adhered to."
The police know the letter of the law, of course - or at
least, the senior officers do - so naturally they have
been quick to point out that it was not an automatic
offence to park on the pavement. But they had to concede
that police do have the power to issue a ticket if the
vehicle is causing an obstruction. In this case, it has
been decided not to book the offending officer who, we
are told, was a new trainee. Well, what do you think?
What alternative to stepping out into the busy road would
anybody have if they were with a child in a pushchair, or
were in a wheelchair?
One has to wonder just how sympathetically a firm's
defence would be viewed - by the police or by the courts
- if it offered the excuse that the offending driver was
new to the job and was not familiar with the area. It
would get pretty short shrift, it is safe to predict. The
assurance from police that the trainee officer was not
issuing tickets on the day in question is completely
irrelevant. Also this police officer presumably holds a
driving licence which meant having to pass his driving
test. This would also mean studying the Highway Code, so
he should be fully aware of the rules of the road.
In another case, an officer operating
Derbyshire police's mobile safety camera unit parked his
van less than four metres from a busy road junction.
Frustrated motorists wishing to get out of Avenue Road on
to the busy A6 running through Duffield were forced to
cross over the middle of the road to go around the police
van to reach the junction. Now, senior police officers
have promised to investigate both incidents.
Superintendent Tony Bateman, head of Derbyshire police's
operations division, said in both cases, standards of
parking by officers had fallen.
He added, "Our officers are fully aware of where
they should and should not park. On this occasion and the
one previously, the parking has fallen below acceptable
standards. Both incidents are now being investigated and
we're grateful to the Evening Telegraph and its readers
for pointing them out. We apologise to any motorists or
pedestrians who may have been obstructed by the
van." Although the way the speed camera van was
parked is not illegal, the Highway Code clearly states
that no vehicle should park within 10 metres (32 feet) of
a road junction in case it obstructs pedestrians or other
road users.
IN
REPLY
A former police officer, who now makes his
living as an advanced driving instructor, has written
following two displays of poor parking by the police.
Chris Pooley of Mickleover-based XPC Driver Training, has
launched an attack on the police speed campaign against
motorists.... more >>>
Next
>>>--
|